|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
In a largely academic setting, Professor of Physics at Brigham Young University, Dr. Steven Jones thoroughly and definitively debunks the FEMA, NIST, and 'fattie bin Laden' myths promoted by the government. The newest version of this DVD is much more in-depth and highly informative. ~ Total Runtime: 58:25 | |||||||||||||
Contents
Include:
| ||||||||||||||
|
************************ | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Scholars for 9/11 Truth" (S9/11T) is a non-partisan association of faculty, students, and scholars, in fields as diverse as history, science, military affairs, psychology, and philosophy, dedicated to exposing falsehoods and to revealing truths behind 9/11. The members of S9/11T are encouraged to take an active role by devoting themselves to reporting the results of research on 9/11 to the nation and the world by means of lectures, articles, and other venues. S9/11T
members are convinced their research proves the current administration has
been dishonest about what happened in These experts contend that books and articles by members and other associates have established that the World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down by controlled demolitions and that the available relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the government's official story about the attack on the Pentagon. They believe
that the government not only permitted 9/11 to occur but may even have
orchestrated these events to facilitate its political agenda. S9/11T
encourages its members to vigorously express their concerns on this score
through lectures, conferences, symposia, articles, and books as well as
other access routes that publicize their findings. Founded by
professors Jim Fetzer and Steven Jones, S9/11T is devoted to applying the
principles of scientific reasoning to the available evidence,
"letting the chips fall where they may". Currently, S9/11T has four categories of members: full members (FM), who have or have had academic appointments or the equivalent; associate members (AM), who have backgrounds and interests relevant to 9/11 research; and student members (SM), who are concerned about these issues and want to pursue them. The special category of society associate (SA) exists for others who wish to publicly support the association.
|
||||||||||||||
|
Review
BYU's Dr. Steven Jones Blows the Roof off a Utah Auditorium by Philip Sherman Gordon On Wednesday, February 1, a quiet, "churchy-looking" gentleman in a white shirt and tie walked into a packed auditorium on the campus of Utah Valley State College and electrified the room like a rock star. The 150-seat auditorium was filled to capacity, with every seat occupied, and people sitting in the aisles from the stage floor to the back of the room. Video cameras on tripods lined the back row. Two documentary-film crews were in attendance, in addition to the school's camera crew, and various independent journalists. Seven "spill-over" rooms, with seating for 40-50 each, were also filled to capacity. On this very conservative campus (in the most conservative county in the most conservative state in the union), where community leaders pulled out all the stops in 2004 to prevent Michael Moore from speaking as part of his anti-Bush, pro-Kerry "Slacker Uprising Tour," Dr. Steven Jones, this pious professor from the Mormon Church-owned Brigham Young University, calmly, gently, gave a simple physics lesson on the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings, the implications of which awed the audience with a sense of world-historical significance, and implied an indictment of the present administration so utterly devastating that it made Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 look like a Bush apologia. Dr.
Jones argues that the physics behind the government's explanation of the
collapse of the Twin Towers on September 11 do not make sense, and that a
better (and perhaps only) explanation for their collapse was that they
were demolished, exactly the way structural engineers bring down large
buildings, by pre-positioned explosive devices set off in precise
sequences. He argues that the
650 degree Celsius temperature of burning jet fuel would not have been hot
enough to even bend the steel girders of the And
on it went, point by point, for almost two hours.
Nothing about the physics of "what we know" about 9/11
seemed to add up. And all
that's not to mention the mysterious collapse of the forgotten WTC-7, the
third steel-frame building that imploded due to fire, not only that day,
but in the history of architectural design--the building that was not hit
by a plane, that was surrounded by other buildings equally impacted but
structurally undamaged by the collapse of the towers, that, with no jet
fuel or violent impact, but allegedly due to a small number of scattered
"debris fires," collapsed, pancaking perfectly into its own
footprint, looking exactly like video images of buildings being demolished
by pre-positioned explosive devices. Playing
the one available video of WTC-7 collapsing at slow speed, Dr. Jones used
his laser pointer to indicate the explosive "squibs" clearly
seen shooting their way up the sides of the building as it collapsed from
the top center down. He showed
still images of similar micro-explosions on the sides of the It
is a devastating presentation, and one could feel the disequilibrium of
150 minds reeling at once. The
defining moment of contemporary American experience suddenly lost its
definition. What is the
meaning of 9/11? What really
happened that day? If these
things are true, the implications clearly point to some kind of
"inside job" involving the government of the And
that is the problem Dr. Jones is facing with his research.
People have knee-jerk reactions to "conspiracy theories,"
at least to the ones that do not make it into their established and
trusted news outlets. And the
mainstream media, so far, despite a blip or two in the New York Times, is
taking a pass on this story. Yes,
my skeptical friends believe that the Bush administration cynically
smeared the war records of both John Kerry and John McCain during the 2000
presidential election through the use of shill agencies.
Yes, they believe there was suppression of black voters in These are hardcore leftists who refuse to even entertain the question of whether science supports the conclusion that the planes brought the towers down. "Too many people would have to know about it for them to get away with it," one friend said. "They're not that smart," said another. "It's just not plausible," said a third. The issues raised by Professor Jones are not breaking along standard political fissures. People's relative amounts of skepticism and credulity, rather than their political affiliations, seem to determine their openness to giving the professor's analysis a hearing. Jones himself claims to have been a lifelong Republican, but now affiliates with no political party. The audience Wednesday night was definitely not the usual suspects of progressive professors and pierced and tattooed activists and students who regularly gather to share criticism of the President, although there were a few of those, too. Mostly, they looked like a cross-section of average middle-Americans. But by the end of the evening, it is no exaggeration to say that most had become political radicals, not of the left and the right, but of the right and the wrong. If Dr. Jones's work ever breaks into the mainstream media, and the rest of the country reacts the way the Utah County audience reacted, traditional political divisions will evaporate like steel beams exploded with thermite, and the whole lot of them, the Democrats and the Republicans, will be swept away, along with the military-industrial complex that has apparently managed to subvert the constitution of these United States and to con the American public, mesmerized by the shock of 9/11 and hypnotized by spell-binding incantations of freedom and patriotism, into going along with their mad plans for world domination.
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||